Al-Qari: The success of the Moroccan national team reflects the development of growth and investment in sports.
Idris Al-Qari, a writer and researcher in philosophy and art, stated that Morocco's brilliance in the World Cup represents a strategic path for development and modernization under the leadership of King Mohammed VI.
Al-Qari confirmed that this amazement and spread was not coincidental, but rather the result of a process that extended over years and decades, perhaps even centuries, as the close connection between the development of Moroccan football and the overall progress witnessed in the country in the fields of economy, diplomacy, and other comprehensive structural sectors became evident.
The same researcher explained, during his participation in the "Hespress Discussion" program, that the strength of Moroccan football lies in its transformation into one of the most powerful forms of effective diplomatic work, or what is known as soft power, indicating that a single match of the national team provided results and promotion that traditional efforts failed to achieve over years with multiplied budgets, making investment in sports a wise decision that transcended superficial views.
The speaker also pointed out that this brilliance reflected the excellence of human development in Morocco, particularly through the experience of the Mohammed VI Football Academy, which he described as "brilliant and enlightened"; the academy, according to him, did not limit itself to teaching football techniques but focused on instilling values, deepening identity, and connection to the national flag, which was evident in the fighting spirit of the players and their pure Moroccan spirit that they carried in their blood and roots, regardless of their country of origin.
In the context of comparing team levels, Al-Qari referred to an international match, considering that placing teams in a clean football environment characterized by rationality, rigor, and the application of the law revealed the true levels away from provocation tactics or exploiting loopholes, affirming that the real failure appeared when teams lacked the ability to maintain tactical and psychological resilience.